In a related development, President Tinubu and his Vice and their party have closed their defence in the joint petition by the Peoples Democratic Party and its candidate, Atiku Abubakar.
The PDP and Atiku are also challenging the outcome of the February 25 election in which Tinubu emerged the winner by the the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC.
Among other grounds, the petitioners contended that INEC did not comply with the electoral laws including failure to transmit the election result electronically using the Bimodal Voters Accreditation System and the INEC Results Viewing portal.
They also argued that, contrary to the provisions of the law, the president failed to poll at least 25 percent of votes from the Federal Capital Territory.
During the resumed hearing in their defence Wednesday evening, the respondents in the petition proceeded to close their case after tendering several documents and calling one witness to testify in the matter.
- Minister advocates extension of NYSC to two years
- Two Chinese expatriates, police inspector killed in Abia ambush
- How Army, vigilantes rescued abducted Israeli from kidnappers’ den in Taraba
- How I was raped by colleague, actress Lolo 1 alleges
- Tinubu vows severe punishment for Plateau attackers, commiserates with families of victims
As in the case of Obi, the Court gave the respondents 10 days to file their final written addresses, the petitioner seven days to respond and five days to reply on point of law.
During the proceedings, the president also called Bamidele as their sole witness.
Under cross-examination by counsel for the APC, Fagbemi, SAN, the witness affirmed that the President was not charged with any criminal offence by any American court.
This was about the widely circulated court affidavit from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division on civil forfeiture proceedings against Tinubu concerning $460,000.
However, the witness affirmed that “there can’t be a conviction without a charge, arraignment and defence.”
He said Tinubu has a clean bill of health as far as criminal charges in the USA are concerned.
He affirmed the statement by the senior advocate that the president is a citizen of Nigeria by birth.
In addition, he affirmed the statement put to him by Fagbemi, SAN, that the court ruled following a suit by the LP that INEC had the liberty to determine the mode of collation of the election results.
Under cross-examination by counsel for the PDP and Atiku, Eyitayo Jegede, SAN, the witness argued that scoring 25 percent votes in Abuja was not a mandatory requirement for the office of the President.
Still, supporting his point that the FCT has a special status concerning the presidential elections and that a president must poll up to 25 per cent of the entire votes to meet the requirement for the apex office, Eyitayo, SAN, said, ” The first respondent will be the first President to emerge without 25 per cent in the FCT.”He went on to tender a publication by Vanguard newspaper wherein the APC kicked against the deployment of the BVAS and IReV for the elections. The Punch
Follow The Eagle Online Channel on WhatsApp
