Some members of the Senate on Wednesday described as superfluous President Goodluck Jonathan’s move to be empowered to initiate the process of drafting a new constitution for the country.
Leading a debate on the report of the Constitution Review committee, which he chairs, the Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekwerenmadu, had informed of the committee’s decision to allow the President to also have the constitutional power to initiate the process of a new constitution.
The committee is seeking amendment to Section 9, which deals with how a new constitution could be processed.
According to Ekweremadu, the alteration being proposed on Section 9 “is to make provision for the President, in addition to the National Assembly, to initiate the process of a new constitution”.
He recalled that the Senate in July last year came up with the idea since Section 9 did not make any provision for how a new constitution would come into being, stressing the need to amend Section 9 in order to accommodate such possibility in the future.
Ekwerenmadu said: “Because as you amend the constitution, it would get to a point where you would not even know which part of the Constitution has been amended and which has not been amended.
“So time will come in the future where we will need to put these things together into a new constitution.
“Again, the society is dynamic to note that at some point there will be the need to have a new Constitution.
“And we won’t be the first to do that.
“Other countries have done that including Kenya, Brazil and Zimbabwe.
“So, further to that, we proposed an amendment to Section 9 last on how a new Constitution can come to force.
“And in that Constitution, we are clear in what we stated that only the National Assembly can bring about the process of a new Constitution.
“But at our committee’s meeting yesterday, we now looked at our rules in which case the President can bring about a Bill.
“So, we now felt that it is also necessary to open the door in such a way that it is not just the National Assembly that can start the process, that even the President can send a proposal for a new Constitution.
“If we leave it as it is now, the President cannot send any proposal for a new Constitution, if it is left as it is today because we have already passed a Bill shutting the President out.”
Ekweremadu explained further that what his committee was doing was to open a window so that the National Assembly or the President can initiate the process which is in accordance with the rules of the senate.
The presentation was immediately greeted with heated debates among the senators present at plenary.
Some called for the rejection of the bill, which, according to them, was aimed at legitimising the ongoing National Conference through the National Assembly.
Others who also spoke against the bill argued that a new constitution was unnecessary because it will further create more problems for the nation’s democracy.
Contributing, Senator Kabiru Marafa noted that inserting a clause to accommodate the President as one of the parties that can initiate the process for a new constitution was an attempt to usurp the powers of the legislature by the executive.
Marafa alleged that going ahead with the alteration would automatically provide a window for President Goodluck Jonathan to give credibility to the National Conference.
On his part, Senator Bello Tukur said the Senate should limit its activities to the amendments of certain clauses identified by stakeholders instead of injecting new ones.
Senator Ahmed Lawan argued that the process of a new constitution was currently the exclusive preserve of the National Assembly.
Lawan said: “We must not dilute the functions of the executive nor that of the legislature.
“I can concede that any President can send a request and that is provided in the Constitution but when we say initiate, it is now taking some functions of the National Assembly away.
“Because of that, I oppose this proposal that we maintain the sanctity, the purity of the functions of the executive and that of the legislature in such a way that there is no lacuna and no confusion.
“This is necessary so that in the nearest future we don’t run into a constitutional crisis where the constitution amendment process will become neither here nor there.”
However Senator James Manager disagreed with his colleagues who opposed the amendment,
Manager said: “An officer of the ranking of the President can also instigate the process of a new constitution by writing to the National Assembly, presenting it as if it is an executive Bill.
“It will still come to the National Assembly exactly in ways and manners we have been dealing with bills.
“So, there is absolutely nothing new in my humble view.
“This are very straightforward and unambiguous matters.”
The Senate Leader, Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, said: “There is already provision for three classes of bills, namely members bills, executive bills and private member bills.”
Ndoma-Egba argued that the amendment being sought was in tandem with the provision of the Senate rules.
Making final comments on the issue, the Senate President, Senator David Mark, ruled that every senator will vote on each of the amendments so far proposed by the committee next Wednesday.
Trending
- IGP, we are more than ripe for State Police, by Taiwo Adisa
- Cocaine trafficking: Two notorious drug kingpins sentenced to life imprisonment
- Impersonation: Army hands dismissed soldier, three others to police
- SERAP sues NNPC over failure to account for ‘missing $2.04b, N164b oil revenues’
- Man allegedly drowns in Lagoon to escape arrest — Police
- One dead, two injured in gas tanker explosion in Abeokuta + Video, photo
- Don’t look elsewhere, you are the battle axe, weapons of war, by Enobong Etteh
- Ex-ASUU leader advocates media independence to boost economic development