Nigeria’s former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Michael Aondoakaa, has advised the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to follow due process in its handling of the investigation of former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.
Aondoakaa, who gave a background into the ongoing controversy surrounding the matter, spoke on Arise TV on Thursday.
He noted that the EFCC had made an error by including Bello in a charge relating to events predating his tenure as governor.
He said it was on the basis of this and other antecedents that the Governor approached the court to enforce his fundamental human rights.
He said: “There was an error in the charge by the EFCC.
“He was being roped up there because he was governor but they referred to the 2015 conspiracy for him.
“In 2015, the man said I was not even a governor.
“I was a governor in 2016.
“That was the premise on which he went to enforce his fundamental human rights before a State High Court.
“The State High Court and Federal High Court have concurrent jurisdiction to enforce fundamental human rights.”
Aondoakaa said the controversy around the whole issue was unnecessary and advised the EFCC to follow the rule of law.
According to the Benue State-born former AGF, once charges are in court, the agency is no longer in a position to arrest.
He said: “Once charges are in court, it is no longer the agency that will arrest, it is the court that will issue summons against Yahaya Bello.
“And if he doesn’t appear, the EFCC will ask for a bench warrant to bring him to come and answer charges.
“But in the subsequent order, the court said because of your antecedents, you should file charges in a court first.
“The court will then serve Yahaya Bello to come and appear.
“But don’t arrest him, don’t detain him.
“I think it is a very fair judgment.”
The former Minister of Justice pointed out that there was a provision to appeal a judgment if an institution deemed it as unfair.
Aondoakaa added: “The position of the law is this: it is not for me or anybody or any agency to interpret a judgment of the court.
Also Read:
- EFCC arrests 23 suspected internet fraudsters in Ibadan
- Energy, solid minerals remain top priority for stimulating Nigeria’s economy, Tinubu tells German businessmen
- Chrisland: Agege stadium workers not interviewed during investigation – Witness
- We’ll handle return of Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso to ECOWAS with wisdom – Tinubu
- US gives $400,000 to preserve ancient Nigerian earthworks
“Where you see that the judgment of the court is unfair, you go on appeal.
“Luckily, the superior court, the Court of Appeal, saw this problem and created a fast-track system.
“The rules specifically made it easier for EFCC or any organisation to approach the Court of Appeal.
“Filing of briefs is only 14 days.
“Filing of the Respondent’s brief is 10 days.
“Reply is five days.
“So the whole trial on such an appeal can only be about one month and judgment will be given.”
Aondoakaa gave an example of how he adhered to the rule of law on principle while he was AGF and followed due process in a particular case involving a former Governor of Abia State, Orji Kalu, even when he had sympathy with the EFCC.
He said the issue of restraining order was about protection and the judiciary and not an individual.
The former Minister said: “The issue of having restraint is not because of the person.
“It is not about Yahaya Bello.
“Yahaya Bello is not above the law.
“But the institution, the judiciary.
“We protect.
“I had a similar situation when I was a Minister of Justice involving Orji Kalu.
“Of course Orji Kalu got orders and EFCC felt strongly they should arrest him.
“Well, I had sympathy with them but I followed the law.
“I said, look, there is a court order, go and vacate the order, and they went to vacate the order.”
Follow The Eagle Online Channel on WhatsApp
