Evans secures lawyer’s service, drags IGP, three others to court

Billionaire kidnapper, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike, popularly known as Evans, has secured the services of a lawyer, Olukoya Ogungbeje, in his case with the police.
The first job of the lawyer was to drag the Inspector General of Police, Ibrahim Idris, and three others to the Federal High Court in Lagos over alleged illegal detention.
The Nigeria Police Force, the Commissioner of Police in Lagos State and the Special Anti-Robbery Squad of the Lagos State Police Command are Idris’s co-defendants.
In the fundamental rights enforcement suit, Evans is seekingthe court’s order directing the respondents to immediately charge him to court if there is any case against him in accordance with Sections 35 (1) (c) (3) (4) (5) (a) (b) and 36 of the Constitution.
In the alternative, he is seeking for an order compelling the respondents to immediately release him unconditionally in the absence of any offence that will warrant his being charged to court.
In the suit, marked: FHC/L/CS/1012/2017, Evans is contending that his continued detention by the respondents since June 10, 2017 without being charged to court or released on bail is an infringement on his fundamental human rights.
He argued that the respondents ought to have charged him to court in accordance with the provisions of Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution.
It was further argued that the alleged offence committed by the applicant (Evans) are correspondingly intertwined with the constitutional safeguards as provided under Sections 35 and 36 of the Constitution.
In a 27-paragraph affidavit in support of the motion deposed to by Evan’s father, Stephen Onwuamadike, it was averred that the applicant has been subjected to media trial without any court’s order by the respondents.
Evans’ father further averred that the media trial and news orchestrated by the respondents have continued to generate reactions in both print and electronic media without his son being afforded fair hearing and trial before a court of law.
The deponent also averred that since his son’s arrest, all his family members have been denied access to him, while media practitioners have been granted unfettered access to him.
The matter has not been assigned to any judge and no date has been fixed for the hearing.