A Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday adjourned ruling to February 5, 2014 in a suit filed by 37 lawmakers who defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressives Congress, seeking to stop the declaration their seats vacant.
Justice Ahmed Mohammed fixed the date after counsel to the lawmakers, Mahmoud Magaji (SAN), informed the court that he had yet to duly serve the Speaker, Hon. Aminu Tambuwal.
The lawmakers had asked for an interlocutory injunction seeking to stop Tambuwal, the PDP and the Independent National Electoral Commission from declaring their seats vacant following their defection to the APC.
Magaji had prayed the court to grant an order for all parties in the suit to maintain the status quo pending the determination of the substantive suit.
Counsel to the defendants, Joe Gadzama (SAN), also told the court that they were unable to effect hearing notice on the speaker to enable the court to go on with the its proceedings.
Justice Mohammed then ordered that a court bailiff should effect the service within three days and adjourned the case to February 5 for ruling.
At the last adjourned date, Justice Mohammed had reserved ruling in the matter for January 29 because the originating summons, filed by the plaintiffs’ counsel, was not ripe for hearing.
He had told parties that he would only hear the preliminary objection subject to whether the said originating summons would be ripe for hearing by the adjourned date.
Some National Assembly members who defected to the opposition APC from the PDP had gone to court seeking an order to stop the defendants from sacking them.
Joined in the suit as defendants are the PDP National Chairman, the Senate President, Speaker House of Representatives, the Peoples Democratic Party and the Independent National Electoral Commission.
However, Gadzama had challenged the court’s jurisdiction in entertaining the matter by way of a preliminary objection.
Gadzama had argued that the plaintiffs lacked the requisite legal standing to institute the suit, which, he said, was wrongly commenced by way of an originating summons, instead of a writ of summons.
Trending
- LASG Promote Environment Hygiene, Steps up Campaign to end open Defecation
- Odumeje ‘Indaboski’ is a true man of God, says Nkechi Blessing
- Workers trapped as building collapses in Kano
- NAFDAC seals bakeries, medicine stores, water factories in Plateau
- Worldwide Anglican Church gives Nigerian Bishop Adeoye new appointment
- Delta: Police arrest 2 kidnappers, recover corpses as kidnap victim escapes
- Delta CP presents over N47m to 22 deceased officers’ families
- Manage your temper, self-defence claims are for court to decide- Delta PPRO