The parliament of a country is the repository of the sovereign will of the people and its successful functioning is a responsibility of individuals who has been elected to represent their constituents. Ordinarily, these responsibilities transcend culture of personal emolument gains or mere sitting in the hallowed chamber in the name of being a senator of the Federal Republic. Parliaments are expected to be active and alive to the plight of the citizenry. The assessment of the Seventh Senate under the leadership of Senator David Mark exposed the ineffectiveness in the lawmaking process in the country.
According to the Senate, between 2011 and 2015, it passed 123 bills into laws out of 591 bills presented, representing 21 per cent of the total bills introduced in the upper chamber for the period under reviewed. Forty-six of these bills were passed within 10 minutes of the last sittings in the chamber, amounting approximately to 37 per cent of total bills passed for the period of four years. By implication, the total bills passed for three years and 11 months were 77.
Despite the shabby performance, the taxpayers bear the larger chunk of their expenses. The budgetary allocation for the National Assembly stood at an average of N150 billion annually during the Seventh Senate. This implies that in the four years, we expended N600 billion to make 123 laws. Therefore, every single bill passed by the Senate cost about N5 billion, with the emolument 50 times higher than the country’s GDP per capital where several million of citizens live on less than N400 per day.
It is suggested that most of these bills passed at the eleventh hour could not undergo the required legislative processes. Since they appeared to be lazy and indolent in their commitment on the issue of national interest, Nigerians should consider their investment on these overrated lawmakers as a waste. With this abysmal performance, they successfully held the executive down from moving on and serve no benefit for those who voted for them.
When an assembly of lawmakers make frivolities the basis for lawmaking, dissipating their energy and time on issues like National Assembly Commission’s budget and homosexuality bills at the expense of life impacting bills like the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Act Bill, Nigerians in Diaspora Commission Bill, Local Refineries Licensing Bill, Dichotomy and discrimination Between First Degree and Higher Diploma in the same Profession (Prohibition) Bill, Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act (Amendment) Bill, Nigeria Infrastructure Fund Bill and the Petroleum Industry Bill that will open up the sector for better competition and unbundling for easy administration, then there is a problem.
To collaborate this position, Bukola Saraki, a senator and now President of the Senate, was quick to urge the Senate to be realistic in telling themselves the truth that they have missed the cut on the level of effectiveness, most especially in regards to amending laws that impact on the revenues and expenditures of the state, budget reforms, infrastructure financing and deployment, accountability instruments and agency laws. The Senate’s shoddy jobs were also confirmed when Saraki made it known that posterity will not forgive them for railroading over 46 bills within 10 minutes.
It is obvious we had an ineffective, overpaid and underperforming lawmaking institution in Nigeria. So Walter Bagehot was right when he described lawmakers as nothing less than a big meeting of more or less idle people. For the new Senate to excel and truly serve the teeming electorate by complementing the executive arm of the government that is really poised to salvage Nigeria from its sorry case, it must deal with torpidity, inertness, skiving and languidness among themselves. It is with these that the country will hope to see laws made for the peace, order and good government of the federation.
—