A Federal High Court, Abuja on Thursday fixed April 30 for judgment in two separate suits challenging the Peoples Democratic Party’s primary election that produced Asue Ighodalo as the party’s governorship candidate for the Edo State poll.
Justice Inyang Ekwo fixed the date after counsel for the parties adopted their processes and presented their arguments.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that while the first suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/195/2024, was filed by Adizetu Umoru, the second suit, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/196/2024, was filed by Moses Alabi and Christopher Oboarer.
Also Read:
- Foreign relations professionals commend NIDCOM, partner to strengthen diaspora engagements
- Fiscal Autonomy: Why CBN hasn’t released funds to 774 LGAs — FG
- Rotary Governor-elect tasks officers on unity, impactful projects
- CP orders thorough probe into couple’s gruesome death in Ekiti
- Police detain two for allegedly torturing suspect to death
The plaintiffs had sued the Independent National Electoral Commission, PDP, Umar Damagu (acting National Chairman), Setonji Koshoedo, PDP’s National Working Committee and its National Executive Committee as 1st to 6th defendants respectively.
INEC had announced that the Edo governorship election will be held on September 21.
The three plaintiffs, in their separate ex-parte motions dated and filed February 19, specifically sought an interim order of the court restraining the defendants from using the list of ward congresses held on February 4 for the purpose of conducting the PDP’s primary in Edo State, slated for February 22 or any other date pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.
Magaji Ibrahim (SAN), who moved the two separate motions, pointed out that the primary election would amount to a nullity if allowed to hold on the grounds that the process which produced the delegates is defective.
According to Ibrahim, the PDP trampled upon the judgment of the court delivered on January 9 when the acting national secretary of the party announced the information of the ward congresses.
He recalled that the court, presided over by Justice Ekwo, had in the January 9 judgment declared Senator Samuel Anyanwu as the substantive National Secretary of the PDP.
He argued that rather than comply with the judgment, the party went ahead to appoint an acting national secretary in flagrant disobedience of the court.
It was the claims of the applicants that the action of the acting national secretary amounted to an illegality and, by extension, the product of the ward congresses held on February 4.
They, therefore, prayed the court to restrain the party and INEC from making use of the list of delegates from the alleged defective congresses.
Although Justice Ekwo declined to grant the application to stop the poll conduct, he ordered the applicants to put the defendants on notice to enable them to appear before the court and show cause why the request against them should not be granted.
Upon resumed hearing of the matter on Thursday, Mathew Burkaa (SAN), who appeared for Umoru, adopted all their processes, including the originating summons dated February 14.
Burkaa urged the court to dismiss the notice of preliminary objection filed by the defendants and grant their prayers.
INEC’s lawyer, I.S. Mohammed; PDP’s counsel, Adeyemi Ajibade (SAN); and the lawyer who appeared for Damagun and Koshoedo, Kehibde Ofunwumiju (SAN), and Robert Emukpoeruo, who represented the NWC and NEC, urged the court to dismiss the suit.
The second suit was equally argued in the same vein.
Justice Ekwo fixed April 30 for judgement.
Meanwhile, the judge fixed the third suit filed on behalf of the 378 ad hoc delegates in Edo State primary poll against INEC, PDP, national secretary of PDP and the vice chairman, PDP South South (1st to 4th defendants) for May 2 for ruling on motion seeking for a change of counsel for the fourth defendant.
Follow The Eagle Online Channel on WhatsApp
