The Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay, on Tuesday insisted that the Senate lacks the power to summon him.
Sagay said the best the Senate can do was to sue him for defamation based on his comment.
Sagay said these in a letter he sent to the Senate over the decision to summon him for statements credited to him on the conduct of the members of the Red Chamber.
Sagay said on the letter addressed to the President of the Senate, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki: “My attention has been drawn to the well publicised resolution of the Senate, summoning me to appear before it to justify my criticism of the illegal call on President Muhammadu Buhari to sack Mr. Ibrahim Magu, the acting Chairman of the EFCC.
“My criticism was anchored on Section 171(1) of the Constitution, which has empowered the President to appoint any person to hold or act in the office of the head of any extra-ministerial department of the Federal Government.
“Although I have not been served with any summons from the Senate, I deem it fit to take issue with members of the Senate over the threatened violation of my fundamental right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Section 39 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act (Cap A9) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
“However, the power to conduct enquiries is not at large. Thus, by virtue of Section 88 (1) & (2) of the 1999 Constitution the National Assembly shall have power to direct or cause to be directed investigation into the conduct of any person, authority, ministry or agency of the Federal Government subject to the provisions of the constitution.”
Sagay, who cited three cases to buttress his point on the powers of the National Assembly to summon people, added that the Senate lacked the power to summon just anyone.
The cases cited were those of Innocent Adikwu v. Federal House of Representatives ((1982) 3 NCLR 394 at 416), Senate of National Assembly v. Momoh ((1983) 4 NCLR 269 at 29), and Mallam Nasir Ahmed El-Rufai v. The House of Representatives, National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria & Ors ((2003) 46 WRN 70).
Sagay said in all the cases cited, the Senate lacked the right to summon him.
He said: “Applying the principle of law, enunciated in the above cited cases, I am fortified in my submission that the Senate lacks the constitutional power to summon me to justify my condemnation of the illegal actions of its members.
“The Senate cannot be accuser, prosecutor and judge in its own case. However, any aggrieved member of the Senate has the liberty to sue me for defamation in a competent court of jurisdiction.
“Consequently, I urge you to withdraw the resolution summoning me to appear before the Senate. If you fail to accede to my request, I will not hesitate to challenge the legal validity of the summons, once it is served on me.”
Trending
- FG reopens Independence Bridge in Lagos, assures permanent fix soon
- Taraba, NAPTIP rescue eight trafficked children from interstate smugglers
- LP factions react to Supreme Court judgement
- Why we took Robotics, STEM education to over 10,000 Nigerian children, by Sam Eseyin and Malik Gwandu
- Tribunal Victory: Benin City stands still for Okpebholo, Idahosa
- First Lady launches free medical outreach in Niger Delta
- Ijoba Lande calls out Funke Akindele for paying him N90k after one month work on set
- Sanwo-Olu swears-in new Chairman for Ayobo-Ipaja LCDA