There is palpable tension in Abia State as lawyers to Labour Party and Alex Otti struggled desperately to have the Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in Umuahia needlessly postponed in order to prevent the testimony of key witnesses.
The expected witnesses are from the Independent National Electoral Commission and National Youth Service Corps.
The witnesses were present to validate the official communications of their respective organisations previously tendered and admitted as exhibits in the suit filed by Chief Okey Ahiwe and the Peoples Democratic Party against the declaration of Otti as the winner of the March 18 2023 governorship election in the state by the INEC.
It will be recalled that INEC through a letter signed by its Secretary, Rose Oriaran-Anthony, confirmed that Labour Party did not submit her membership register in Abia State as required by law and that the party failed to notify the electoral body of the date fixed for its congress, hence the commission did not monitor any congress purportedly organised by the party in the state.
Otti, the Labour Party candidate, also failed to submit his NYSC discharge or exemption certificate, but rather presented a reference letter to INEC while filling his governorship form.
The two witnesses from INEC and NYSC had arrived on Thursday, but were asked to return for proceedings on Saturday.
But no sooner had they arrived at the Abia State High Court, Umuahia, venue of the proceedings, than the drama started with various applications by counsel for Labour Party and Otti making frantic efforts to have the testimonies of the INEC and NYSC officials postponed or truncated all together.
The drama started on Friday when the Petitioners (Chief Okey Ahiwe and PDP) served the Respondents with a motion to present the official witnesses of fact for their oral evidence against which the Respondents’ lawyers argued that they could not cross examine the witnesses on the same day because they needed time to study the application.
On that note, the tribunal adjourned the matter to Saturday for the motion seeking the leave of the court to allow the official witnesses adopt the documents they brought through their written depositions.
Saturday was ordinarily for the matter to continue, but the Respondents’ lawyers begged the court for yet another adjournment because Anayo Nwakodo, who is one of the lawyers representing Labour Party, wrote the court that he suddenly took ill and that none of the other lawyers in their team, including four Senior Advocates of Nigeria, could cross examine the witnesses in his absence.
Counsel to the petitioners vehemently opposed the motion for adjournment, stating that the witnesses came from outside the state and that the respondents were merely playing to the gallery in their bid to frustrate the case and delay the wheel of justice.
He contended that the Respondents were petrified by the weight of the evidence of the official witnesses hence the ploy to use technicalities to delay the inevitable.
The Petitioners’ lawyers prayed for the hearing to continue.
After listening to both parties, the tribunal adjourned the matter to August 10, 2023 for the witnesses to be led in evidence and warned against further use of any form of delay tactics to stall proceedings as the court was working to conclude the case within the period stipulated by the Electoral Act.
Shortly after the adjournment, counsel to the respondents, who claimed to be ill and hospitalised, was spotted around the High Court premises discussing with some Labour Party members who were at the tribunal, a development which irked PDP supporters present.
Also Read:
- Nine abducted Ondo surveyors released after payment of N20m ransom
- Oluwadolarz’s fiancée announces break up over alleged infidelity
- Bandit kingpin, Dogo Saleh, killed by gang in rescue attempt – Police
- Reform judiciary before 2027, Nigerians no longer trust judges, Primate Ayodele tells Tinubu
- Alleged rights breach: Court dismisses commercial sex workers’ suit
A PDP chieftain at the tribunal described the attitude of the respondents as being “aimed at delaying the inevitable sacking of the interim government in the state”.
According to him: “With defeat staring them in the face, LP and her interim Governor are doing everything to compromise tribunal members and witnesses sent to validate official documents issued by INEC and NYSC, but we will make sure that justice prevails even if it means remaining perpetually vigilant.”
He further alleged that the respondents were trying to stop the key witnesses from testifying.