Justice Maryann Anenih of the Federal Capital Territory High Court has fixed December 10, 2024 for rulings on the bail applications by the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, and two others and remanded the defendants in the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
She fixed the date after arguments by Bello’s lawyer, Joseph Bodunde Dauda (SAN), and the prosecution counsel, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN).
Bello and two others, Umar Shoaib Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu, had on Wednesday pleaded not guilty to the 16-count charges brought against them by the EFCC.
Bello, who is the 1st defendant, vehemently denied the allegations before Justice Anenih as they were reeled out by the Court Registrar.
After taking their plea, the Defendant’s Counsel moved an application for bail.
- Allow your husband to defend himself, Natasha advises Senate President’s wife
- June 12, annulled dreams and unending agony, by Abiodun Komolafe
- Abandoned wife seeks divorce after one year of marriage
- Housewife docked for alleged unlawful possession of human skull
- Three Air Peace aircraft suffer bird strikes in 24 hours
But Pinheiro opposed the application, saying it had expired in October.
Daudu said the only relevant application before the Court was the motion for bail in respect of the first defendant, which was filed on November 22.
Relying on all the paragraphs of the affidavit, he added that the bail application was also supported with a written address.
“Exhibit A, which is the public summons, is very vital and the appearance of the defendant in court today shows he has respect for the law,” he said.
The EFCC had moved for trial to commence immediately and was ready to call its first witness.
But Bello’s counsel argued that they were served with the charge at 11pm on November 26 and that he would need time to prepare his client.
On the bail application, Daudu said the law in the country says a defendant is innocent until proven guilty.
He said: “It is within his rights to enjoy his liberty while preparing for trial.
“The prosecution’s objection is based on the fact that he is facing charges at the Federal High Court and has refused to appear to take his plea.
“The court should not use issues from another court to determine issues before the FCT High Court.”
Pointing out some paragraphs in the counter affidavit, Daudu said the prosecution raised issues that had to do with a matter at the Federal High Court, adding: “When the jurisdiction of the court is challenged, the defendant need not to appear until the issues arising from the jurisdiction are resolved.”
Objecting to the submissions of Daudu, counsel to EFCC held that his preliminary objection was anchored on three grounds: competence of the application, factual content of the application, and application of judicial principles and guidance.
Justice Anenih thereafter rose for a short recess.
After the recess, the prosecution counsel also opposed the bail application for the 2nd Defendant, saying since he was still a government official serving as the Director-General, Kogi State Government House, there was the likelihood of him committing the same offence.
But the Defendant’s Counsel argued that the use of “may” in the prosecution’s counter affidavit did not show where the 2nd defendant allegedly committed another offence after being granted bail.
He insisted that the counter affidavit lacked merit as it did not show that the defendant was a habitual offender.
He therefore urged the court to grant the application for bail.
Justice Anenih adjourned ruling on the bail application to December 10 and directed that the three defendants should remain in EFCC custody.
Recall that Oricha and Hudu had earlier been admitted to administrative bail by the EFCC while the former governor appeared before the court for the first time.
Follow The Eagle Online Channel on WhatsApp
