The Presidency has told the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party in the 2023 elections, Atiku Abubakar, that had he won, he would have plunged Nigeria into a worse state than it is now.
The Presidency spoke in response to a statement by the former vice president on what he would have done differently as president.
Abubakar said this in response to the dire economic situation of Nigerians.
He then offered insights into what he would have done differently if were to be in the shoes of President Bola Tinubu, referring largely to his blueprint.
But responding late on Sunday, the Presidency in a statement by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, said Nigerians rejected Abubakar at the polls alongside his blueprint, adding that he would have plunged Nigeria into a worse situation.
Onanuga said in what was tagged as an initial response to Abubakar: “We have just read a statement credited to former vice president Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, in which he tried to discredit President Bola Tinubu’s economic reform programmes while pushing his untested agenda as a better alternative.
“First, Alhaji Atiku’s ideas, which lacked details, were rejected by Nigerians in the 2023 poll.
“If he had won the election, we believe he would have plunged Nigeria into a worse situation or run a regime of cronyism.
“Abubakar lost the election partly because he vowed to sell the NNPC and other assets to his friends. Nigerians have not forgotten this, nor would they be comforted by Atiku’s antecedents when he ran the economy in the first term of President Olusegun Obasanjo’s government between 1999 and 2003.
“As vice president, Atiku supervised a questionable privatisation programme. He and his boss demonstrated a lack of faith in our educational system, and both went to establish their universities while they allowed ours to flounder.
“Talk is cheap. It is easy to pontificate and deride a rival’s programmes even when there are irrefutable indices that the economic reforms yield positives despite the temporary difficulties.
“Despite the futile attempt to hoodwink Nigerians again in his statement, it is gratifying that the former Vice President could not repudiate the economic reforms pursued by the Tinubu administration because they are the right things to do.
Also Read
- Hunt together, prosper together, by Lasisi Olagunju
- TETFund reacts to allegation of funding APC
- Why President Tinubu made Wike minister — Akpabio
- Minister urges states not to downgrade, scrap Information Ministries
- 2025: FG unveils plan for job creation, empowerment, innovation for Nigerian youths
“His advocacy for a gradualist approach only showed that he was not in tune with the enormity of problems inherited by President Tinubu.
“It is so easy to paint a flowery to-do list. It is expected of an election loser.
“President Tinubu met a country facing several grave challenges. Fuel subsidies were siphoning away enormous resources we could ill afford, and there was criminal arbitrage in the forex market.
“No leader worth his name will allow these two economic disorders to persist without moving to end them surgically.
“While advocating for gradual reforms may sound appealing, Tinubu took measures that should have been taken decades ago by Alhaji Abubakar and his boss when they had the opportunity.
“Alhaji Abubakar calls for empathy and a human face to reforms. We have no problem with this as it resonates well with our administration’s focus. President Tinubu has consistently emphasised the need for compassion and protection of the most vulnerable.
“The administration has prioritised social safety nets and targeted support for those affected by recent economic transitions.”
Follow The Eagle Online Channel on WhatsApp
