The Emir of Kano and former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi 11, has said the report of the PricewaterhouseCoopers on the missing $20 billion oil money does not in anyway exonerate the Minister of Petroleum Resources, Deziani Alison-Madueke.
Rather, Sanusi said the report further established that the gap between the company’s oil revenues between January 2012 and July 2013 and cash remitted to the government for the same period was $18.5 billion.
According to him: “Of the $18.5 billion in revenues that the state oil company did not send to the government, about $12.5 billion appears by my calculations to have been diverted.
“And this relates only to a random 19-month period, not the five-year term of Mr (Goodluck) Jonathan, the outgoing president.”
Sanusi has, therefore, enjoined the incoming administration of General Muhammadu Buhari to pursue the lines of investigation contained in the PricewaterhouseCoopers report.
Recall that a forensic audit conducted by the PricewaterhouseCoopers at the instance of the Federal Government indicted the management of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation under the supervision of Alison-Madueke for various questionable transactions.
The report in part recommended that the Nigerian Petroleum Development Company, the upstream subsidiary of the NNPC, should refund about $1.48 billion to the Federation Account.
Emir Sanusi’s position that the issue should not be laid to rest yet was contained in an article he wrote titled: “Unanswered questions on Nigeria’s missing oil revenue billions.”
It was published in the Financial Times of London.
He posited: “The lines of investigation suggested by this audit need to be pursued. Any officials found responsible for involvement in this apparent breach of trust must be charged.
“Contrary to the claims of Petroleum Minister Diezani Alison-Madueke, the audit report does not exonerate the NNPC. It establishes that the gap between the company’s oil revenues between January 2012 and July 2013 and cash remitted to the government for the same period was $18.5bn.
“The auditors say a significant part of the unremitted funds is supposed to have gone towards a kerosene subsidy that had been stopped two and a half years earlier by the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. His decree never appeared in the official gazette, leading some to question whether it ever had legal force.
“Evidence disclosed in the report suggests this is a sideshow. The executive secretary of the agency charged with administering subsidies confirmed that, acting on Yar’Adua’s orders, it had ceased granting subsidies on kerosene. There was no appropriation for such a subsidy in the 2012 or 2013 budgets.
“Throughout all this, Nigerians paid 120-140 naira a litre of kerosene, far more than the supposed subsidised price of 50 naira. Yet the state oil company withheld $3.4bn to pay for a subsidy that in effect did not exist. I have consistently held that this was a scam that violated the constitution and siphoned off money from the treasury.
“The second major item raised in the report relates to the transfer of oil assets belonging to the federation to the Nigerian Petroleum Development Company, a subsidiary of the NNPC.
“NPDC has paid $100m for these assets, from which it extracted crude valued at $6.8bn but paid tax and royalties worth $1.7bn in the period scrutinised by the auditors. PwC was unable to establish how much of the remaining $5.1bn should have been remitted to the government. But the report showed that, along with the private companies NPDC partnered with, it was extracting crude worth billions of dollars but yielding very little revenue for the treasury. I was investigating related transactions when I was suspended.
“The third major item is a claim of $2.8bn by NNPC for expenses not directly attributable to crude oil operations; PwC said “clarity is required” on whether such upfront deductions from remittances to the federation accounts are allowed, or whether the money should have been remitted to the government. Finally, there are duplicated expenses, “unsubstantiated” costs, computation “errors” and tax shortfalls; a total of $1.48bn has to be refunded.”
Trending
- Hydrogen hosts catalyst workshop, highlights resilient business models for Fintech startups
- Tinubu approves take-off of Consumer Credit Scheme
- Over N650m debt profile: Oyo clamps down on advertising practitioners, third-party agents
- NAF airstrikes kill terrorists, destroy hideouts in Borno
- Man docked for allegedly obstructing arrest of notorious criminal
- Sanwo-Olu launches Eko Cares initiative for 500,000 household
- Illegal importation of firearms: Court sentences defendants to two years imprisonment
- Troops subdue 3 Boko Haram terrorists in gunfights